The University of Mpumalanga (UMP) hosted the second Annual Research Impact Workshop on 01 August 2025, the University of Mupmalanga bringing together academics, policymakers, and experts to examine how research can achieve meaningful societal change.
Discussions focused on the National Research Foundation (NRF) Research Impact Framework, the ethical use of Artificial Intelligence (AI), the dangers of predatory publishing, and case studies highlighting UMP’s own contributions to research with impact.
Deputy Vice-Chancellor: Research, Innovation and Internationalisation at UMP, Professor Aldo Stroebel, stressed the importance of embedding impact at the centre of all UMP research activities, noting that the University’s vision aligns with national priorities as guided by the NRF framework.
“This is to ensure that our work not only advances knowledge but also transforms communities, attracts partnerships, and empowers future leaders. Our research must address real-world challenges and focus on the needs of our province, while remaining globally significant.”
Professor Stroebel added that building a culture of impact requires deliberate effort: “We must think beyond publication metrics. True impact means influencing policy, improving lives, and engaging meaningfully with the people our research aims to serve. This involves building bridges with policymakers, the private sector, communities, and practitioners, and ensuring our students are trained as impact-oriented researchers and leaders.”
The NRF Research Impact Framework
Acting Head of Research, Analysis and Advice at the NRF, Dr Genevieve Simpson, outlined the NRF’s Research Impact Framework and its components, emphasising that societal impact is the beneficial change in society or advancement of knowledge resulting from NRF-funded research.
“The framework identifies clear pathways to impact, from inputs and activities to outputs, outcomes, and long-term societal change. It is not linear because impact can take multiple routes, and in many cases, it can take five to fifteen years to manifest. This is why planning for impact from the start is critical,” she explained.
Dr Simpson also highlighted the NRF’s growing requirement for impact statements in some funding programmes.
“An impact statement should outline the expected outcomes, the activities to achieve them, and how end-users will be engaged. We encourage researchers to connect with communities and stakeholders from the very beginning to ensure that the work is relevant, responsive, and beneficial,” she said, adding that impact may be social, economic, environmental, or informational. “Whatever the form, the ultimate measure is whether the research improves people’s lives and advances the public good.”
The workshop brought together academics, policymakers and experts.
Open Science, AI, and Research Integrity Dr Susan Veldsman, Director of the Scholarly Publication Unit at the Academy of Science of South Africa (ASSAf), spoke on research integrity, the growing influence of AI, and the risks of predatory publishing.
“In 2023 alone, over 10,000 research papers were retracted globally, many due to misconduct or unethical practices. The pressure to publish can tempt researchers into questionable avenues, but the cost to credibility is far too high,” she cautioned.
Dr Veldsman acknowledged both the benefits and risks of AI in research, noting that it can improve efficiency and access but also raises concerns about fabricated data, false references, and plagiarism.
“We must have clear guidelines for AI use and be transparent about how it is applied. Researchers need to ask themselves: Is AI helping me improve the quality and integrity of my work, or is it compromising it?”
She reminded researchers to remain guided by ethical principles despite the pressures of visibility and influence.
“We cannot allow the race for citations, media coverage, and policy influence to erode our standards. Rigour, transparency, and trust are the cornerstones of credible research,” she said. “Balancing impact with integrity is not just a professional obligation; it is the foundation for long-term relevance.”
UMP Director of Research, Dr Naledi Nthite encouraged delegates to utilise the library as a resource for guidance on reputable platforms.
Relevance, Mentorship, and Collaboration
Director of Research at UMP, Dr Naledi Nthite, reinforced the importance of relevance, ethics, and collaboration in research. “The NRF framework guides research for societal benefit, and the new AI guidelines will address ethical challenges while upholding excellence,” she said.
She stressed that science should be communicated in clear and accessible ways to non-specialist audiences to maximise its reach and influence. Researchers, she argued, need visibility not only among academics, but also policymakers, communities, and the wider public.
Dr Nthite further urged researchers to avoid predatory publishing, pointing to UMP’s Research Office and Library as resources for guidance on reputable platforms.
“Publishing in unreliable journals affects individuals, the institution, and the wider academic community," she said announcing a new mentorship programme for early-career researchers, designed to help them conduct impactful studies through learning from experienced academics and engaging with real-world case studies.
The workshop concluded with a call to action for participants to explore upcoming international scholarships, funding opportunities, and collaborative projects.
As Professor Stroebel reflected earlier in the day: “We must be bold, we must be relevant, and we must ensure that the knowledge we generate resonates far beyond our campuses.”
Story by Cleopatra Makhaga. Pictures by Siyabonga Magagula. Copyright @UMP